Online Communities: Good for Learning?
ICTs foster new connections and so enable new opportunities for knowledge
production. It is not surprising that workers are clicking their way into all
sorts of cyberspaces. There is plenty of buzz about online communities whether
they are part of new social media configurations, such as Facebook, LinkedIn, or
Twitter, or commercialized online product-related spaces carefully cultivated by
enterprises. The scale is astounding. Yahoo (2008) alone reports over 113
million members in 9 million groups.
Online communities appear to offer
something, be it socializing, networking, information or support. But what do we
know about these cyberspaces as sites of learning? As it turns out we could know
a lot more. Researchers and practitioners are still wrestling with how to best
facilitate collective learning online; a challenge that is magnified in the
informal communities outside formal education. One of my current research
projects focuses on the "informal" online spaces where people go for
work-related learning. Although this research explores how self-employed workers
engage in these spaces, these findings are relevant for all adult workers
engaged in lifelong learning pursuits.
The Term: "Online community" is
applied to a myriad of online configurations. Some are structured, as in an
online course, complete with bounded membership and purposeful design strategies
to attain desired learning outcomes. These spaces have generated the most
research. However, "online communities" also describe a gathering of people
online that is organic, driven by a shared interest, and highly social. These
kinds of spaces may also be nurtured by professional associations, workplaces,
or businesses. What we call these spaces is not as important as understanding
the nuances that make them distinct and therefore call for different learning
and instructional design strategies.
Slippery Notions: Hodgson and
Reynolds (2005) state that idealized interpretations of this concept ignore its
more problematic aspects: "limitations in relation to difference, the oppressive
aspects of conformity, and the obstacles to participation given inevitable
inequalities and conflicts of interest" (p. 17). Edwards and Usher (2008)
caution that only those with the necessary skills will be in a position to take
full advantage of the Internet for learning.
Networked Configurations:
Increasingly "community" does not exist in single sites but is built through a
network of sites (Baym, 2007). Thomas Ryberg (2008) describes online communities
as focused on "interaction, shared interest, and communication" while networked
participation entails a "constant traversing of different types of networks with
strong and weak ties" (p. 661). These networked architectures enable workers to
construct individual, but deeply relational networks, often through social
media.
Online configurations are evolving. I believe that many workers
are moving toward more networked architectures of online participation. Many
will include online communities in their configurations, despite the
slipperiness of the notion and the inherent tensions. As illustrated in my
study, closeness and connection to others is important for some people. Online
communities provide a sense of place for these kinds of interactions. How these
complex and exciting spaces will change is open to debate, although one thing is
certain, they will change.
- a few blogs that I follow which explore these kinds of issues from time to time:Jon Dron (professor at Athabasca University, School of Computing and Information Systems), Stephen Downes (National Research Council of Canada), Terry Anderson (Canada Research Chair in Distance Education)
-
CPsquare- an international community of practice about communities of practice
References
Baym, N. K. (2007). The new shape of online community: The example of Swedish independent music fandom. First Monday, 12(8). Retrieved from http://firstmonday.org/
Edwards, R., & Usher, R. (2008). Globalisation and pedagogy: Space, place and identity (2nd ed.). Milton Park, England: Routledge.
Hodgson, V., & Reynolds, M. (2005). Consensus, difference and 'multiple communities' in networked learning. Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), 11-24.
Ryberg, T. (2008, May). Challenges and potentials for institutional and technological infrastructures in adopting social media. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Networked Learning, 658-665. Halkidiki, Greece. Retrieved from http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/past/nlc2008/Info/confpapers.htm#Top
DOT Researcher-in-Residence
Digital Opportunity Trust

